Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Conflicting dates: Samuel Silva

Cousin Connie recently brought to my attention the World War I registration card of our Great Granduncle, Samuel Antone Sabino Silva.  On it he states he was born Oct. 11, 1889.  I have him being born Oct. 11, 1892.  Which one is it?

His dates:

-1910 census, Cummins St., he is 17, living with his sister Rebecca and her husband Obed Kaai, the head of household.  Estimated birth year: 1893.  Him, his sister and nieces are noted as 'Chinese', but this is wrong.  CH is caucasian/hawaiian in the Hawaii census, but CH is Chinese in the US census.


-31 Jul 1917-World War I registration card he states he was born Oct. 11, 1889 (28 yrs)


-11 Oct 1917-Marriage certificate of Samuel Silva to Esther Kaialiilii, he is age 24, estimated birth year 1893.

-1920 census (he appears twice).
1) With step father Joseph James Fern & family, he is age 28, estimated birth year 1892.
2) As head of household, he is age 31, estimated birth year 1889.

-8 Aug 1928, voter application.  Samuel Silva of 3511 Hinahina St., age 38, born Oct. 11, 1889.

-1930 census, 3511 Hinahina St, Oahu, he is head of household, age 41.  Estimated birth year: 1889.

-3 Feb 1936-Obituary states he was born Oct. 11, 1892.  Death certificate states date of birth, Oct. 11, 1892.  Informant:Mrs. Emma K. Fern of 3450 Hardesty St., his mother.

It's interesting that when Samuel is the informant of his own birthdate, he's pretty consistent with the year 1889, but when it's someone else informing on his birthdate, it's consistently 1892 or 1893.  Only on his marriage certificate in 1917, where you think he's the informant to his own age, he states he is 24, but hold on.  The license to marry was issued by Palmer P. Woods, who was at the time the personal secretary of Joseph James Fern, (mayor of Honolulu), the step father of Samuel Silva.  Was Palmer the informant on the marriage certificate, having personal knowledge of the family?  Samuel Silva being the stepson of the Mayor of Honolulu, did he even have to appear in person to fill out the license to marry on May 14, 1917 like the general public?  Could Palmer just have gotten the information from Joe Fern?  If Samuel was really born in 1889, what would be the purpose for the others to have him be younger?  Besides the draft registration what would be the advantage of appearing older?  Did four years really make a difference on the draft anyway?

Still so many questions.

Edit:
Samuel Silva in 1920.



2 comments:

  1. Looks like you are on the right track: analyzing the informants could lead to answer.

    Census records are a grab bag when it comes to secondary information -- you never know if it was a neighbor or a family member who provided the information to the census taker.

    How old was Esther when they married in 1893? Could there have been a reason to make himself younger or like you suggest below, the informant may have felt that way.

    Your analyzing the information and reasoning for the marriage certificate is excellent because it points out possible bias due to the Step-father.

    Try ordering his Social Security Application, for that would have additional primary information regarding his date of birth. Although they did not have to provide proof when applying for that record, it is likely that they submitted some form of documentation.

    Finally, look into Hawaii marriage laws during that time. Google books has digitized many of them and they may have the answer.

    And then you get to apply the genealogical proof standard to it once you start resolving the conflicts and providing a sound conclusion. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Darcie for the marriage law tip, I never thought of that.
      Esther was 22 in 1917.
      I could never find him in the ss death index.
      There's a picture of him at the grave of his step father in 1920 and he would only be 28 at that time, but to us he looks way older.

      Delete